Math, physics and HIV/AIDS
Math, physics and HIV/AIDS
Posted 00:51am (Mla time) Feb 25, 2005
By Michael L. Tan
Inquirer News Service
Editor's Note: Published on page A15 of the February 25, 2005 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer
I WAS recently interviewing a 22-year-old male in an urban poor community for a sexuality research project, when he got around to boasting that he'd never had to pay for sex. There were many girls in their community who were readily available. When I asked if he used condoms, he scoffed, "Malinis naman sila. Mga pok pok lang kasi (They're clean. They're just pok pok.)."
I was flabbergasted. In my time, "pok pok" meant a sex worker, but apparently there's been a semantic shift so it now means females who don't necessarily charge for sex but who are available in exchange for a night out drinking. Because they're sort of free, they're seen as "clean."
Last Wednesday, I wrote that the AIDS epidemic in the Philippines, often described as "low and slow," might have shifted gears away from a low simmer to a slow boil. The concerns have been serious enough to spur UNAIDS, the Swedish Embassy and the Asian Development Bank to sponsor an AIDS summit in Manila earlier this week.
At that AIDS summit, Health Secretary Manuel Dayrit named the groups most vulnerable to HIV/AIDS: 500,000 to one million sex workers and their clients; 15.7 million young people aged between 15 and 24; 7.6 million overseas Filipino workers.
The figures, and the story of the "pok pok," got me thinking about how we urgently need more research on Filipino sexuality so we can project how HIV/AIDS might spread, and what we can do in terms of prevention programs.
Critical mass and velocity
Epidemiologists (scientists who study how diseases spread) often use terms from math and physics. Thus, you will find references to "critical mass," which in the case of an HIV/AIDS epidemic would be the pool of infected people who engage in risky sex, which means frequent unprotected sex with a constant change of partners. Once a critical mass is reached, the "velocity" of HIV spread could increase very quickly.
How might young adults contribute to the critical mass? In terms of numbers, their sheer size could mean serious problems. Unfortunately, our anxieties with young people focus mainly on premarital sex, to the point where we may have become blinded to the broader issue of irresponsible sex, whether in or out of marriage.
The 2003 National Demographic and Health Survey found that by the age of 19, one out of every five Filipinas has begun childbearing. I feel this is an even more important indicator of risk than premarital sex. Young people who have had their "coital debut" (first intercourse) may not necessarily be having regular sex, especially if they remain unmarried. I'm more worried about the young Filipinas who get pregnant early and are then marched off to get married.
These young couples could actually contribute to the critical mass for HIV/AIDS. Young husbands, especially if forced into an early marriage, are more likely to be having extramarital flings, exposing themselves and their young wives to sexually transmitted diseases. Yet, little is being done to educate these young couples about their risks.
Transactional sex
What about the sex workers? When "prostitution" is mentioned, we imagine the HIV/AIDS epidemic moving at a high velocity, in terms of frenzied activities in brothels, bars and massage parlors, each sex worker servicing dozens of partners each week.
I'd challenge those perceptions. An ongoing research project of Health Action Information Network (HAIN) found GROs ("guest relations officers") complaining about being suspended for not being able to reach a quota of three customers a week ... for "tabling," meaning customers who will just sit and drink with them. Similarly, massage parlor attendants complain that there are times when they may have no customers at all for a week or so. The brutal fact is that in the Philippines, the supply of sex workers outstrips the demand.
While government and NGOs concentrate on monitoring establishment-based workers through testing and campaigns to use condoms, we may be missing out on an even more vulnerable segment of the population: those engaged in transactional sex.
Many Filipino men may actually avoid the entertainment establishments because they're expensive. A cheaper alternative is transactional sex, involving freelance, part-time sex workers. These include students who may solicit clients in malls or out in the streets to supplement their allowances or to rush a tuition fee installment (thus the term "prosti-tuition"). In transactional sex, the financial remuneration may be quite low; in fact, sometimes the transactions will involve material benefits -- anything from a few bottles of beer, to clothes, to watches and cell phones -- rather than actual cash.
Those who engage in transactional sex (and these can include the pok pok) do not usually think of themselves as sex workers, and will rarely think of using condoms. We therefore have a potential here for rapid HIV transmission.
'Suki' and FB
Ironically, it may be our Catholic culture that creates this demand for transactional sex, as well as other varieties of risky sex. Because outright prostitution is seen as "sinful," our men create alternative arrangements to downplay the commercial angle. Thus, when they do go to entertainment establishments or pick up a freelance sex worker, they will go into "dating" mode, complete with courtship.
I call these "suki" relationships, where a customer returns to the same sex worker over several weeks or months, slowly transformed from a "guest" to a "boyfriend," or even a temporary "asawa" (spouse). What does this mean in terms of HIV transmission? On one hand, it does mean a reduced rate of partner change, which could slow down HIV spread. On the other hand, because the relationship has some semblance of a "boyfriend/girlfriend" arrangement, with illusions of fidelity, condoms could disappear from the equation, which means greater risks for HIV.
Confused? I haven't even started talking about FBs or f---king buddies. Like the suki relationship between a sex worker and a frequent-flier customer, FBs create some semblance of a monogamous relationship, without imposing any claims of commitment to each other. The risks for HIV exist because there will be change of partners, and condoms are again not used because the partners don't think of each other as sex workers.
There will be overlaps across FB, transactional and commercial sex, i.e., you can have someone working as a GRO at night, while supplementing her income with an occasional fling on the side as a pok pok and maintaining a special FB live-in relationship with a boyfriend from high school. What we see in these overlaps are dangerous "bridges" for HIV infections crossing over from one group to another.
Sex and the risks for HIV/AIDS involve more than acts. They involve a mazeway of perceptions, meanings, scripts, feelings about different partners, in different settings. The sooner we understand these mazeways, the better equipped we will be to handle the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
Posted 00:51am (Mla time) Feb 25, 2005
By Michael L. Tan
Inquirer News Service
Editor's Note: Published on page A15 of the February 25, 2005 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer
I WAS recently interviewing a 22-year-old male in an urban poor community for a sexuality research project, when he got around to boasting that he'd never had to pay for sex. There were many girls in their community who were readily available. When I asked if he used condoms, he scoffed, "Malinis naman sila. Mga pok pok lang kasi (They're clean. They're just pok pok.)."
I was flabbergasted. In my time, "pok pok" meant a sex worker, but apparently there's been a semantic shift so it now means females who don't necessarily charge for sex but who are available in exchange for a night out drinking. Because they're sort of free, they're seen as "clean."
Last Wednesday, I wrote that the AIDS epidemic in the Philippines, often described as "low and slow," might have shifted gears away from a low simmer to a slow boil. The concerns have been serious enough to spur UNAIDS, the Swedish Embassy and the Asian Development Bank to sponsor an AIDS summit in Manila earlier this week.
At that AIDS summit, Health Secretary Manuel Dayrit named the groups most vulnerable to HIV/AIDS: 500,000 to one million sex workers and their clients; 15.7 million young people aged between 15 and 24; 7.6 million overseas Filipino workers.
The figures, and the story of the "pok pok," got me thinking about how we urgently need more research on Filipino sexuality so we can project how HIV/AIDS might spread, and what we can do in terms of prevention programs.
Critical mass and velocity
Epidemiologists (scientists who study how diseases spread) often use terms from math and physics. Thus, you will find references to "critical mass," which in the case of an HIV/AIDS epidemic would be the pool of infected people who engage in risky sex, which means frequent unprotected sex with a constant change of partners. Once a critical mass is reached, the "velocity" of HIV spread could increase very quickly.
How might young adults contribute to the critical mass? In terms of numbers, their sheer size could mean serious problems. Unfortunately, our anxieties with young people focus mainly on premarital sex, to the point where we may have become blinded to the broader issue of irresponsible sex, whether in or out of marriage.
The 2003 National Demographic and Health Survey found that by the age of 19, one out of every five Filipinas has begun childbearing. I feel this is an even more important indicator of risk than premarital sex. Young people who have had their "coital debut" (first intercourse) may not necessarily be having regular sex, especially if they remain unmarried. I'm more worried about the young Filipinas who get pregnant early and are then marched off to get married.
These young couples could actually contribute to the critical mass for HIV/AIDS. Young husbands, especially if forced into an early marriage, are more likely to be having extramarital flings, exposing themselves and their young wives to sexually transmitted diseases. Yet, little is being done to educate these young couples about their risks.
Transactional sex
What about the sex workers? When "prostitution" is mentioned, we imagine the HIV/AIDS epidemic moving at a high velocity, in terms of frenzied activities in brothels, bars and massage parlors, each sex worker servicing dozens of partners each week.
I'd challenge those perceptions. An ongoing research project of Health Action Information Network (HAIN) found GROs ("guest relations officers") complaining about being suspended for not being able to reach a quota of three customers a week ... for "tabling," meaning customers who will just sit and drink with them. Similarly, massage parlor attendants complain that there are times when they may have no customers at all for a week or so. The brutal fact is that in the Philippines, the supply of sex workers outstrips the demand.
While government and NGOs concentrate on monitoring establishment-based workers through testing and campaigns to use condoms, we may be missing out on an even more vulnerable segment of the population: those engaged in transactional sex.
Many Filipino men may actually avoid the entertainment establishments because they're expensive. A cheaper alternative is transactional sex, involving freelance, part-time sex workers. These include students who may solicit clients in malls or out in the streets to supplement their allowances or to rush a tuition fee installment (thus the term "prosti-tuition"). In transactional sex, the financial remuneration may be quite low; in fact, sometimes the transactions will involve material benefits -- anything from a few bottles of beer, to clothes, to watches and cell phones -- rather than actual cash.
Those who engage in transactional sex (and these can include the pok pok) do not usually think of themselves as sex workers, and will rarely think of using condoms. We therefore have a potential here for rapid HIV transmission.
'Suki' and FB
Ironically, it may be our Catholic culture that creates this demand for transactional sex, as well as other varieties of risky sex. Because outright prostitution is seen as "sinful," our men create alternative arrangements to downplay the commercial angle. Thus, when they do go to entertainment establishments or pick up a freelance sex worker, they will go into "dating" mode, complete with courtship.
I call these "suki" relationships, where a customer returns to the same sex worker over several weeks or months, slowly transformed from a "guest" to a "boyfriend," or even a temporary "asawa" (spouse). What does this mean in terms of HIV transmission? On one hand, it does mean a reduced rate of partner change, which could slow down HIV spread. On the other hand, because the relationship has some semblance of a "boyfriend/girlfriend" arrangement, with illusions of fidelity, condoms could disappear from the equation, which means greater risks for HIV.
Confused? I haven't even started talking about FBs or f---king buddies. Like the suki relationship between a sex worker and a frequent-flier customer, FBs create some semblance of a monogamous relationship, without imposing any claims of commitment to each other. The risks for HIV exist because there will be change of partners, and condoms are again not used because the partners don't think of each other as sex workers.
There will be overlaps across FB, transactional and commercial sex, i.e., you can have someone working as a GRO at night, while supplementing her income with an occasional fling on the side as a pok pok and maintaining a special FB live-in relationship with a boyfriend from high school. What we see in these overlaps are dangerous "bridges" for HIV infections crossing over from one group to another.
Sex and the risks for HIV/AIDS involve more than acts. They involve a mazeway of perceptions, meanings, scripts, feelings about different partners, in different settings. The sooner we understand these mazeways, the better equipped we will be to handle the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

